Blogging through Wikipedia (2024)

 Watched video :  Alternative Intelligence: The Other A.I. ( Isaac Arthur) Linked :  https://youtu.be/ZIGaYw1dUfM?si=7JS4mpqUtGCtrdsm 1) What was surprising or interesting in the video?  An interesting point is the attempt to compare animal intelligence with humans using the EQ index. This index evaluates the intelligence and complex behaviors of different species by considering brain size relative to body size. By comparing this to the high EQ in humans, it helps to understand which animals possess particularly high cognitive abilities. Additionally, the concept of EQ plays an important role in evolutionary biology and comparative neuroscience. It allows the analysis of brain evolution and cognitive development across various species. For example, by comparing how different species with similar brain sizes exhibit different cognitive abilities, we can gain a deeper understanding of animal behavior patterns and social structures. A fascinating aspect is how animals can surpass humans i

Q 1 : When you search for information, do you prefer to use AI or Wikipedia? Why? When encountering different types of questions, I choose different search methods. For highly quantitative questions requiring precise answers, I prefer using AI to assist with calculations. For inquiries leaning towards humanities or a comprehensive understanding of historical aspects, I opt for using Wikipedia. However, for everyday questions, I predominantly rely on AI for answers. Wikipedia explanations on certain topics may not always be comprehensive, often necessitating supplementary information for accuracy. Although AI responses may appear overly structured, they provide multiple perspectives and directions for consideration. Asking AI questions allows for more flexible and personalized inquiries, whereas Wikipedia requires precise terminology for searches and cannot address personalized queries. I asked both Wikipedia and AI about "Analysis of the 2013 smog in East China." Wikipedia pr

Q 1 :   How does the community choose what news to feature?  The nominated article needs to contain high-level instructions and provide timely updates on the event's progression. The selected article must go through very important steps before it can be added. The article should include a large number of relevant linked articles, which need to be continuously updated during the course of the event. To be recognized, an event must avoid conflicts on key points, such as nationality, race, ethics, and subjective political support. The content of the article also requires high quality, with comprehensive descriptions of the subject, fluent sentences, and clear logic. The article should not primarily rely on tables for its presentation. Q2: Is the Wikipedia news section global?   I believe that Wikipedia's news content is global. The news section on Wikipedia is edited and published independently by volunteers. They provide factual updates on news and report events without their own

Summary: Good Trust Collaboration is a book by Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. that explores the culture and history of Wikipedia. The book delves into Wikipedia's authoring principles, with a particular emphasis on the core concept of "good trusting cooperation". Wikipedia promotes "good faith collaboration," which means that editors should collaborate with the assumption that the intentions of others are good, even if their edits may be controversial or incorrect. This philosophy has helped the Wikipedia community maintain a harmonious and inclusive atmosphere, encouraging editors to work together in the pursuit of sharing and improving knowledge. In his book, Reagle analyzes how Wikipedia has succeeded in creating an open, transparent and highly participatory knowledge platform through this collaborative model. He points out that although Wikipedia's openness may pose some problems, such as content accuracy and edit wars, overall, this culture of trust and coll

 Summary: This Wikipedia article, Help to the Manual of Style/1, is the first part of the Wikipedia Manual of Style series, designed to help editors understand and follow Wikipedia's editing standards and writing guidelines. By providing specific editing rules and advice, the article aims to ensure that all Wikipedia entries are consistent, clear and easy to read. The article emphasizes that writing should be as concise and clear as possible, avoiding long and complex sentences. A concise writing style improves the readability of the article, making it easier for readers to understand and access the information. For example, simple sentence structure and straightforward language are recommended to avoid placing an unnecessary reading burden on the reader. Secondly, the article states that all entries should maintain a neutral point of view. This means that editors must write entries without personal bias and present all points of view fairly. Neutral writing helps maintain Wikipedi

 1.Summary The Manual of Style (MoS or MOS) for Wikipedia provides guidelines to ensure articles are clear, consistent, and well-organized. It is a reference tool meant to guide editors in formatting articles properly, though it does not need to be memorized. When unsure about formatting, editors can refer to the MoS or look at well-written articles for examples. It’s important to prioritize content over formatting, and to welcome help from other editors in good faith. Articles should start with a brief summary of the topic and then provide more detailed information in logically organized sections with clear headings. The lead section is the first part of an article, appearing before the table of contents and any headings. It should succinctly define the topic, highlight its significance, and summarize the key points in one to four paragraphs. The lead should be written in an accessible style to encourage further reading and should include citations for any important information not c