Blogging through Wikipedia (2024)

 When I read Wikipedia's "know" page, I understood the operation and the value better. Do you know 'is a unique part of Wikipedia and shows interesting facts about recently created and expanded projects. This encourages not only the editor but also the reader's interest. First, I know that there is strict participation in the part of "know." You can select the items that you have recently created, greatly expanded, or translated, and only detailed content that matches the standards of Wikipedia. In other words, editing the project requires much time and effort to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the exam. This column has greatly enhanced the enthusiasm of the Wikipedia editors, and the selected items have attracted more attention, as well as the honor to prove that the editors' efforts have been recognized, and this incentive mechanism facilitated continual renovation and improvement of Wikipedia content, and editors contributed greater power t...

 In the process of editing Wikipedia, I learned the power of collective wisdom and also learned many things that I usually did not learn in the classroom. In the process of reading the Editor's Handbook, I learned how to write neutral, accurate, and organized content. What I learned from the editorial manual: 1. Neutral viewpoint: All information is objective and neutral, without personal bias. 2. Verification and trusted sources: Information must be verified and referenced to trusted sources. 3.  Simplicity and clarity: If you don't want to use complex terminology, please keep it simple and clear. 4. Unified Format: The title, citation, table of contents, etc. must be in the prescribed format to ensure the uniformity and cleanliness of the article. Different from existing tasks: 1. Collaborative Environment: Unlike individual tasks, Wikipedia editors modify and improve projects through team tasks. 2. Audience Disclosure: Wikipedia's readers are not just teachers and classm...

 After reading the "classification" page of Wikipedia, I found a deeper understanding of the organization and management of Wikipedia content. The classification system is a very important feature in Wikipedia and helps users quickly search for relevant information and understand relationships between different items. This page describes the purpose, principle, and operation method of the classification system, and makes the importance of classification in knowledge management more clear. First, the importance of the classification system was clarified. Wikipedia has a large amount of information, and without a valid classification and organization, users find it difficult to quickly find what they need. Rational classification allows Wikipedia to aggregate relevant items and provide clear knowledge structures for navigating huge databases. The knowledge management of this system enhances not only the user experience but also the usability and practicality of the information....

 By reading Wikipedia's "project development" page, we've been able to know the whole process from rough to perfect to nothing from the Wikipedia project. On this page, we will continue to edit and improve from drafts and finally provide a way to form a quality encyclopedia project, not only showing a specific stage of the development of the project but also the principles of community cooperation and editing behind Wikipedia. First, the development process of the project shows the power of collective wisdom, Wikipedia is an open platform for anyone to participate in the creation and editing of the project, and the openness can rapidly develop and improve the project, the editors contribute their knowledge and view for the project, collect wisdom, and gradually make the project more detailed and accurate, and the group cooperation model enhances the interaction of the community as well as enhancing the quality of the project. Second, the development of the project emp...

 By reading the Frequently Asked Questions  page of Wikipedia's shared resources, you can gain a deeper understanding of the platform's operating mechanism, usage rules, and underlying concepts. Wikipedia's shared resources are a global media library that includes various image, audio, and video files for users to freely use and share. The FAQ page provides a detailed introduction to possible issues that may arise when using or contributing resources and provides clear explanations. Firstly, the FAQ page emphasizes the openness and sharing of Wikipedia's shared resources. All media files uploaded to the platform must comply with free copyright agreements, allowing users to freely use, modify, and redistribute resources. This principle embodies the concept of knowledge and cultural sharing, promotes the free flow of information and creative dissemination, and in this process, everyone is a user and contributor of resources. This dual identity enhances the interaction and...

 When I read the culture rebuilding page of Wikipedia, I had new recognition and thinking for contemporary culture creation and propagation. Restructuring culture is to create and reconstruct existing works. This is not only a creative means but a cultural phenomenon and reflects new models of information sharing and idea exchange in the digital age. First, the mixed culture makes the creation more popularized, and the public can easily acquire, modify, and propagate existing works through the network and digital technology, this method breaks the limit of the creator and the consumer in the traditional culture creation, and the openness and the participant make the culture creation more diverse and rich, for example, the music mixing, the video editing, and the concentrated creation embodies the freedom of this creation. Second, hybrid culture embodies the culture of the mind. In this culture, the work is not stationary invariant but is constantly constructed and reconstructed, gi...

 I read a reliable page on Wikipedia and found a way to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of information. This guide describes the source that is likely to be reliable and how to select the appropriate references to create and edit a Wikipedia entry. First, this guide clearly explains what is "reliable source" is. A reliable source is usually issued by a reliable publisher and is a source of rigorous examination of the referral and other forms. For example, academic journals, authoritative books, and famous news agencies are good sources. On the other hand, the content of personal blogs, their publications, and social media is considered unreliable. This criterion provides a clear directive for editors to ensure Wikipedia's information quality. Second, the guidelines highlight the importance of verifiability. All information added to Wikipedia must be investigated, so the quoted source must be publicly accessible. Through this principle, Wikipedia hopes that readers w...

 Exploring the various references of Wikipedia in popular culture is interesting and thoughtful. From comedy satire to serious criticism, diversity in various cultural representations of Wikipedia reflects a broad impact on modern society. For example, Steven Corbert created the term "common sense of truth" in his satirical report, the Colbert Report, not in agreement with the editorial process of Wikipedia, but rather the accuracy of the fact, rather than the accuracy of the fact. His jokes emphasized widespread concerns about the operability of packet information and the ease of propagation of false information in the digital space. At the Wikipedia monument in Swawick, Poland, there is a very different figure of sculptor Mian Jacobian designed to commemorate the contributors of Wikipedia. This monument is not only a symbol of the online encyclopedia but also a demonstration of collective effort and knowledge sharing. Musicians such as Weird Al Yankovic and composer Andy Bo...

 Through the provided articles, we have found a deeper understanding of the complex issues involved in maintaining the accuracy and reliability of information in a collaboration platform such as Wikipedia. This article provides insight into the notable historical lies of Wikipedia as well as defines the characteristics of these deceptive projects. The lie defined here includes not only the act of misleading information or the damage to the public but also the intention of deliberately providing false information. This distinction is very important because Wikipedia editors emphasize the challenge of distinguishing sincere mistakes, public damage, and deliberate lies. One of the most interesting discoveries in cited research is the way to lie. The automated system was more effective than humans in lie detection. It highlights the importance of the technology tools to protect the integrity of Wikipedia content. The provided statistical data was amazing. Most of the lies are quickly d...

 After reading the book "fortune dance collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia" by Joseph M. Reid Jr., I was deeply impressed by the exploration of the complex mechanics of the success and evolution of Wikipedia. The ethnographic study of Rigle examined the history, cultural norms, and cooperative practices that define the Wikipedia community. One important point of this book is that Rigle believes that Wikipedia's success is not only the progress of technology but also the result of their attachment to the Wikipedia community and cultural norms. This point of view challenges the traditional point of view that only technological innovations can lead to these projects. Regent emphasizes the concept of "good faith" and emphasizes that mutual trust, patience, courtesy, and humor play an important role in maintaining Wikipedia's growth and quality. This book provides a comprehensive backdrop of the history of Wikipedia to explore the unique tracks of Wikipedia, ...

 This paper examines the uniqueness and complexity of Wikipedia as an open content community. Each puzzle block describes the Wikipedia operation mechanism based on the old puzzle metaphor that represents a different language or cultural background contributor. With this diversity and cooperation, Wikipedia can work as a whole, but the process of realizing it is full of challenges and controversies. I read this article and felt the importance of honesty and a neutral view in Wikipedia. The neutral viewpoint guaranteed the objectivity and fairness of the encyclopedia, and sincerity promoted respect and cooperation among contributors. The technical tools and collaboration platforms mentioned by the authors have provided significant support for this process, but more importantly, the community culture and values that lead to the results of Wikipedia complete. But in the text, we discussed the various issues faced by Wikipedia, such as the quality of the content, community governance, ...

 I read Chapter 6 of the good faith community of Joseph Rigle and found a deeper understanding of the community of Wikipedia. This chapter is really interesting, and I often talk about the internal management and social movement of Wikipedia. First, the rifle introduced the details of how the community of Wikipedia is working together. He said this was not just a website but a big family of global service teams. They come from different backgrounds in the world but strive for common goals to build foundations of free and reliable knowledge. I think that this spirit of cooperation is very difficult because people show how people can create such a big project by passing through different cultures and times. Second, Briggs referred to how Wikipedia deals with collisions and collisions. Needless to say, these large families cannot afford to be mistaken. However, they have a series of rules and guidelines to manage these issues to ensure the fairness and transparency of the discussion. ...

 I read chapter 4 of The Good Trust Community by Joseph Rigle and understood the editorial culture and the rules of Wikipedia. This section provides a detailed introduction to how Wikipedia maintains the accuracy and fairness of content through community cooperation and self-management. Below is my impression: First, rigle described the editorial principles and rules of Wikipedia, such as the "neutral point of view" and "verifiability" principles. These principles provide clear guidance to the contents of Wikipedia and make the project as objectively reliable as possible. Interestingly, these rules are not the authority of the authorities, but the community members are established and improved. This self-management method can not only enhance community cohesion but also guarantee the quality of Wikipedia. She also refers to the collaboration culture of Wikipedia. The Wikipedia editing process is open and transparent, and everyone can participate and contribute to th...

After reading Chapter 2 of "The Pursuit of the Universal Encyclopedia," I was deeply moved. Author Joseph Reagle provided a detailed introduction to the origin and development of Wikipedia, as well as the importance of trust and collaboration in this community. Here are my thoughts. Firstly, Reagle introduced how Wikipedia has grown from a small project to today's global knowledge platform. The success of Wikipedia lies not only in technological innovation but also in establishing new trust mechanisms and a culture of cooperation, which allows volunteers from around the world to edit and maintain content together, forming a community of self-regulation and self-improvement. Rigel emphasized the core role of trust in Wikipedia, where anyone can edit it. However, this openness did not confuse but instead formed a strong self-monitoring mechanism. Volunteers, driven by their love for knowledge and a sense of community responsibility, actively invested time and energy to ensu...

In this article, I found the psychology of the author who studied Wikipedia. Wikipedia is full of personal memories and reflections. This is interesting. The following is my idea. First, the author left the World Internet Federation and entered graduate school. He started to be interested in new Internet apps and blogs but was attracted more to the collaboration community such as Wikipedia. He found a different discussion atmosphere in blogs and Wikipedia, and these observations enhanced his curiosity about Wikipedia. This experience shows the opening and exploration spirit of the scholars' new things. Next, we introduce the original charm of Wikipedia as a collaboration platform. His work experience at W3C will help us understand the importance of teamwork, and Wikipedia also shows the power of cooperation. He said many people might feel bored creating an encyclopedia but found that Wikipedia was an interesting collaborative theme. I was able to understand more about the managemen...

 In this article, we have gained a new understanding of the uniqueness of Wikipedia. This article describes how Wikipedia has grown from an almost unpopular project to one of the best websites on the Internet. Ten years ago, no one, including founder Jimmy Wales, expected them to achieve what they are today. Today's Wikipedia not only changes the way we obtain information but also showcases a new way of collaboration. Wikipedia is unique because it is a collaborative community composed of volunteers. Not for money, people will actively invest love, time, and energy to allow knowledge to spread more freely. This model empowers people with unprecedented power, inspiring their love for knowledge and desire to share. This is the purest driving force. The article also mentioned the importance of open source culture. Open-source culture promotes sharing and cooperation, and Wikipedia is an important embodiment of this culture. Scholars have also studied this phenomenon and explored its i...

 Other wikipedians have proposed other ideas for my deletion suggestion, and he suggested keeping the entry. But as a Chinese, I am well aware that this term does not have any meaning, its usage rate is very low, and it has a short timeliness. It briefly appeared around 2005. So I think we can stick to our own ideas and write more reasons on the discussion page.