Blogging through Wikipedia (2024)

 1)  The passage provides insights into the autocratic tendencies of community founders in open content communities like Wikipedia, emphasizing their informal leadership roles shaped by initial contributions and influence on community culture. It explores the dynamic between Wikipedia co-founders Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales, highlighting Sanger's initial leadership and subsequent resignation due to tensions with Nupedia's progress and Wikipedia's community. Wales' influence on Wikipedia's culture is discussed, focusing on his behind-the-scenes leadership style and emphasis on values like patience, civility, and humility. The passage also delves into Wikipedia's governance structure, highlighting the roles of administrators, ArbCom, and the Board of Trustees, while emphasizing the importance of collaborative norms and good judgment among administrators. Overall, it provides a comprehensive overview of leadership dynamics and governance in Wikipedia's communi

 1. summary The entire content of this article is mainly about the efforts made by Wikipedia users to maintain the utopia of their dreams, the process of becoming benevolent dictators through their efforts, and how to balance the rights of benevolent dictators. So I believe that understanding the community and its collaborative culture is the key to understanding Wikipedia. However, unlike the pure utopian dream, WikiLeaks must reconcile its vision with the inevitable social reality. Although Wikipedia has a sincere culture of cooperation, egalitarian spirit, and openness - or precisely because of this - it has always been shaped by the author's leadership, which creates a problem where the author may act as a benevolent dictator to maintain the environment of Wikipedia at some level. An informal benevolent dictator is responsible for gently guiding the community, mediating internal disputes between kind-hearted individuals, and protecting those who are dishonest. However, when a p

            The article discusses the role and sources of power of leaders in open content communities. Although leaders may face criticism, they also exist out of a need to address community difficulties. Leaders play an important role in the decision-making process, especially when it comes to controversies and difficult decisions. Wales is described as an influential but not entirely authoritarian leader, and his power is seen as that of a "constitutional monarch", that is, limited but significant authority.            The article also identifies challenges and controversies within the open content community that require leaders to take action to protect the values and goals of the community. However, leaders' actions can be controversial and questionable, requiring them to exercise power carefully to ensure that due process and democratic processes in the community are respected.        interesting points                Describing leaders as “benevolent dictators”, wh

 a)While Wikipedia, as a wiki-style online encyclopedia, strives to provide accurate and reliable information, with the increase in mass editing and dissemination of information, fake news and misinformation can also appear in it. The ZJU hoax and a number of other hoaxes have appeared on Wikipedia, and these instances show that even a platform edited by a large number of volunteers can't completely eliminate the appearance of errors and fraud. Collective intelligence to fight misinformation requires first recognizing the possibility of its existence and responding to it accordingly. Here are some of the ways I have personally found effective: 1. Emphasize the importance of reliable sources: When editing Wikipedia or accessing information, priority should always be given to using sources from reliable, authoritative sources. These sources may include scholarly publications, professional journals, official reports, and trusted news organizations. By citing these sources, the accurac

  1) Humans try to find clear ways to solve their difficulties, but they tend to prioritize good-faith assumptions and agreements in decision making. In this regard, it can be concluded that the Wikipedia community relatively accepts the ambiguity inherent in world encyclopedia work and trusts human judgment in the long run. This is because Wikipedia has a unique mission and method while also dealing with conflicts in the real world. Wikipedia is an interesting example of the historical methods of community decision making In order to reach an agreement, the Wikipedia community goes through various procedures. These include various steps, such as proposing changes, requesting opinions, and voting on straws. However, sometimes this approach can be neutralized in situations where reconciliation is difficult. Therefore, Wikipedia manages these situations through leadership in the form of a "merciless dictator." 2) The use of humor and cynicism in reaching an agreement shows that

 In the Open Conundrum, the author explores the challenges and dilemmas faced by Wikipedia as an open content community. The article points out the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's openness and calls for a deeper understanding and discussion of the concept of openness. The authors begin by citing several "laws" about Wikipedia's openness, highlighting the potential for problem users to drive out good users and the role of malicious users in incentivizing good editors. This leads to a discussion of the dilemma of openness, whether it promotes better community participation and contribution, or whether it leads to abuse and confusion. The paper further explores the concept of openness, and points out that in today's context, "openness" has become a popular word, used to modify various concepts, but there is confusion and misunderstanding about its exact meaning. The author emphasizes the inevitability of structure in social relations and gives e

 1.Summary: Culture encompasses the entirety of what we learn and acquire, profoundly influencing human identity through stories, beliefs, and values. Historically, culture has been subject to elitist standards, valuing certain activities while dismissing others, perpetuating class-based distinctions. However, contemporary social science embraces the diversity of cultures, recognizing their multifaceted nature and rejecting evaluative class distinctions. Cultures vary across societies and are artificially classified, yet they coexist with society, impacting its development and structure. Sociologist Ritzler's integrated model offers a comprehensive framework for understanding culture, highlighting its symbolic transmission and susceptibility to change. Cultural change, driven by environmental factors, invention, and intercultural contact, is accelerating in the age of globalization. 2.Interesting Point: An intriguing aspect lies in the exploration of cultural diversity and its impl

 1. Summary  The pre-culture movement is a social movement that promotes freedom to distribute and modify works for free. Lawrence Lessick led the movement against seeing copyright laws too restrictively. He played a significant role through the challenge of Sony Bono copyright extension law and the establishment of Creative Commons. The movement aligns with other movements, such as open-source software, remix culture, and open access. Major organizations related to pre-culture include Creative Commons, student body FreeCulture.org , and QuestionCopyright.org . These organizations are striving to promote cultural diversity and scientific progress in their own way. Opposition to the pre-culture movement mainly comes from copyright advocates, who are criticizing the idea of the pre-culture movement. 2. What was interesting  How the pre-culture movement influences cultural creativity and scientific progress while promoting free sharing and modification of works. Also, its connection with

 1. Summary The freedom and openness of Wikipedia is not the ideal of complete freedom and total openness. This openness and freedom is relative in nature. Although Wikipedia as a platform is open and allows anyone to edit and view content, there are limitations. It is not absolutely open and free in order to maintain the quality and credibility of the content and to comply with legal and ethical guidelines. 2. Interesting points Wikipedia wants to create a free, developed platform that anyone can participate in. However, there are still many problems that need to be solved regarding discrimination, transparency, and so on. Because it is impossible for all participants to guarantee that their positions and opinions are absolutely fair when editing, even though Wikipedia has made regulations about the accuracy of the content. However, this does not fundamentally solve the conflict between Wikipedia's openness and content accuracy. 3. Questions What should be done to ensure

1.Summary This article explores the characteristics of Wikipedia as an open content community and the challenges and values involved. It opens with two "laws" about Wikipedia, highlighting the phenomenon that problematic users may drive out good users, and that malicious users may inspire editors to create quality articles. The article explains Wikipedia's vision of itself as an open content community, and explores the potential and challenges of openness. The definition of "openness" is explored, and the impact of the open source software movement on Wikipedia is mentioned. Historical theories of organisational structure and community norms are cited, highlighting the inevitability of structure in social relations. The article discusses Wikipedia's early "no rules" principle and its limitations. The notion of openness does not imply a complete lack of constraints, but requires a degree of structure and norms. Despite the difficulties, the concept

1.Summary The vision and potential of Wikipedia as a global knowledge-sharing platform, as well as the challenges and endeavours to achieve this vision. The article quotes the definition of Wikipedia, describing it as the ultimate goal of "the sum of all human knowledge", but also points out the realities and challenges of this goal. The author refers to the vision of Wikipedia's founder, Jimmy Wales, of universal access to knowledge by making encyclopaedic knowledge available free of charge to people around the globe, especially those who could not afford the cost of a printed encyclopaedia. However, realising this vision requires overcoming a variety of technological, economic and cultural barriers. The article also points to the potential of technologies to facilitate access to knowledge and human harmony, such as the telegraph, radio, photographic reproduction facilities, and the aeroplane. These technologies are seen to promote world peace, authenticity, and mutual u

Summary This material provides a thorough analysis of the operational mechanisms and various challenges faced by open content communities. Firstly, open communities aim to achieve information sharing and free discussion, yet must navigate the complex balance between core values such as transparency, integrity, and non-discrimination. This implies that communities must strive to ensure the accuracy and comprehensiveness of information while maintaining openness to attract diverse participants and preserve inclusivity. Secondly, defining the boundaries of a community becomes a crucial issue. Community boundaries are not merely open or closed; they require finding a balance between openness and closure. This involves addressing power dynamics and decision-making processes within the community, as well as managing conflicts and differences among different groups. The case of Wikipedia as an open content community is highlighted. Despite achieving some degree of success, Wikipedia still fac

Summary These three materials collectively highlight the understanding, interest, and research into the Wikipedia project, along with gratitude towards its participants. They underscore the significance of Wikipedia as an open, free online encyclopedia and emphasize its value as a collaborative community. Authors explore the meaning of Wikipedia from different perspectives and delve into its history and spirit of collaboration. Despite differing in personal experiences and expression, they all demonstrate unique insights and profound understanding of the project. Overall, these three materials collectively convey the importance of Wikipedia as a global collaborative endeavor and underscore its unique value as a platform for sharing knowledge. Interesting point Although Wikipedia is a project driven by volunteers, its impact is significant. This is highlighted in the material, emphasizing Wikipedia's status as a top-tier website and its contribution to defining ethical standards and

 1.Summary Two different articles show the value and impact of Wikipedia and the author's observations and research on its history and development. The authors see value in researching what was once considered impossible but has since been shown to be possible, and Wikipedia is a prime example of this. Wikipedia, as a collaborative community, continues to convey understanding to the world through free and voluntary co-operation and has become one of the very capable sites on the Internet. By delving into the history and ethnography of Wikipedia, the authors show how it has evolved from a small community to a platform for global knowledge sharing. The value of Wikipedia is not only in the breadth and reliability of its content, but also in its spirit of community co-operation and openness. Although Wikipedia is not perfect, it has earned respect and has become an organisation worthy of deeper study. The author also shares his personal experiences and observations of Wikipedia, thus

 (LATE POSTING -Due to receiving the invitation link to the blog quite late, I submitted the blog post very late. Please forgive me.) 1.Summary This course uses Wikipedia to teach students a sociological understanding of collective intelligence on the Internet. Students improve their critical thinking as well as their English writing and speaking skills.The first part of the study introduces students to the problems facing modern societies around the world. The second part focuses on how societies are organised, including topics such as the role of race and gender. Part III focuses on various global aspects of social change, such as globalisation, revolutions and social movements. 2.Interesting Point This course features a variety of learning styles and approaches, combining readings, lectures, discussions, and collaborative wiki-based group writing projects. Learn how to create and extend Wikipedia articles by writing content in PBL style activities. Not only is the course interesting

  1) summarize in your own words of materials you read Free culture movement is a social movement that oppose copyright laws, and asserts information to be freely reproduced, applied and improved. It also asserts that copyright is an obstacle to culture creation, sharing knowledge, industry innovation, and personal interest. There are many organization related to free culture movement. For example, CC which promotes sharing creative works and mixing ideas and Question copyright which shows how good the distribution based on freedom is for both artist and the public. 2) mention of any new, interesting, or unusual items learned It was interesting that there are many movements opposing to copyright laws, because I thought creative works must be protected, and everybody else would think same as I do   3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more If there are no profits for creators, would creat

 1. Summary Open content communities like Wikipedia have various characteristics. These communities provide open content, maintain transparency, ensure integrity, prohibit discrimination, and do not allow interference. In Wikipedia, transparency and integrity are emphasized, enhancing trust and understanding among users. Transparency fosters trust by making decision-making processes and their reasons clear, helping newcomers understand community culture and reducing abuse. This promotes fair conduct, encourages user participation, and transparently manages community activities. However, transparency alone may not achieve perfect transparency, and sometimes too much information can be harmful. 2. Interesting point The interesting part I found is about the policy-making process of Wikipedia. Specifically, the text discusses how the Wikipedia community transitions towards bureaucratic governance as it grows, shaping and reinforcing policies and procedures within the community. It provides

    1.Summary:         The driving force behind Wikipedia is its trolls. According to Bachmann's Law, the worst trolls often inspire the best editors to create excellent articles and provide impeccable references. The pursuit of a universal encyclopedia aims to increase access to information for anyone eager to learn. However, the openness of Wikipedia, inspired by the Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) movement, is not a panacea for collaboration. The meaning of "open" and "anyone" is complex, as seen in the contradictions within Wikipedia's guiding principles. Despite challenges, abandoning the concept of openness entirely is not the solution. From the perspective of developing content communities, the Wikipedia community is an interdependent group who engage in discussions and decision-making collectively, sharing practices defined and restored by the community. They possess common practices and norms, demonstrating a culture of collaboration, further u

1. summary  Sociology is discussed as a branch of the social sciences that uses empirical investigation and critical analysis to develop knowledge about the structure and activities of human society with the aim of applying this knowledge to government policy and social welfare.It covers a wide range of topics from micro-level interactions to macro-level social processes.The traditional focus of sociology includes social relations, social stratification, social interaction, culture and deviance, using qualitative and quantitative research techniques.Emphasis is placed on the evolving methods and approaches in sociology, such as the cultural turn of the 1970s and 1980s and the rise of new mathematically rigorous methods such as social network analysis.It emphasizes the importance of understanding that societies are constantly changing and that sociology is rooted in significant social change.Early sociological theorists, such as Marx, Weber, and Durkheim, focused on social processes tha

 1.summary This week's article describes the characteristics and challenges of Wikipedia as an open online encyclopedia.Wikipedia is a platform co-edited by users, so there are various opinions and misunderstandings.Conflict and consensus are important topics in Wikipedia's development.Consensus refers to the process of agreeing with other editors, a phenomenon that often occurs in Wikipedia.The article also explores naming conflicts and ways to address them, such as using disambiguation pages.In addition, the article describes the role of arbitration commissions, which deal with disputes that cannot be resolved, but whose decisions are also challenged and challenged.The article also emphasizes the importance of consensus, noting the flexibility and adaptability of the Wikipedia community to challenges. 2.Interesting point After reading the article, I thought there were some interesting parts.For example, an in-depth discussion of Wikipedia's consensus-building process, and

  1. summary Chapter 5, "The Challenges of Consensus," delves into the methods employed by Wikipedia in its decision-making processes, including consensus, voting, and polling. While consensus is considered the preferred method, there are instances where polling is utilized. Consensus emphasizes decision-making through discussion and reaching a shared understanding, whereas voting places greater emphasis on numerical support. The chapter provides a detailed analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of these two approaches and explores the considerations for selecting a decision-making method based on the size of the community. Additionally, it highlights the challenges that the Wikipedia community may face in the decision-making process, such as communication barriers and groupthink, emphasizing the importance of leadership in such an open community. Creating a good outline for a Wiki project on Wikipedia involves defining the topic scope, organizing information, adhering to W

1.Summary:  The article explores various aspects of open content communities, using Wikipedia as the main example. The core feature of open content communities is the provision of open platforms for accessing and sharing information, but this poses a number of challenges, including how to balance the values of transparency, integrity, non-discrimination, and how to deal with issues such as freedom of expression and community safety. The article first describes the basic principles and operations of Wikipedia as an open content community, including group editing, a transparent editorial discussion process, and a focus on content quality and accuracy. The article then delves into Wikipedia's coping strategies in the face of challenges such as legal threats and negative content censorship, as well as its approach to outside influences. The article then discusses bureaucratization in open content communities and how to balance formal processes with transparency and flexibility in organ

 1、Summary The Free Culture Movement aims to promote the free distribution and modification of creative works, oppose excessive copyright laws, and advocate for open and free cultural exchange, in line with ideas such as the Free and open source software movement. The FreeCulture Movement, which aims to promote the sharing and modification of creative works, is associated with Creative Commons, FreeCulture.org and others, but has been criticized by copyright supporters. 2、Interesting place What is interesting about the Free Culture Movement is that it is a social movement that aims to break traditional cultural restrictions, promote knowledge sharing and innovation, and thus promote a more open, inclusive and progressive society. 3、Problem How did the Free Culture Movement affect the traditional copyright system? What challenges and reforms does it propose?

 1、Summary Culture is the abiotic or social aspect of human life that includes everything people learn, such as stories, beliefs, media, ideas, works of art, religious practices, fashions, rituals, expertise, and common sense. Culture is not only about objects or actions, but also about norms, values, beliefs, or symbols of expression. It gives meaning to objects and symbols, and the norms, values, and beliefs prevalent in social life are also part of culture. Culture is dynamic, it is not rigid, but constantly changing through continuous negotiation and development. Culture is an important part of human social life, and the understanding of culture has undergone evolution over time. From the nationalist concerns of German scholars in the Romantic era, to the more inclusive and relativist views of modern social scientists, culture is seen as a symbolic system encompassing objects, symbols, norms, values, and beliefs. The origin and development of culture is a complex process closely re

 1. Summary The free culture movement aims to promote the free distribution and modification of creative works, opposing overly restrictive copyright laws, dubbed as "permission culture". This movement aligns with the free and open-source software movement and includes organizations such as Creative Commons. Student organizations within it are sometimes mistakenly referred to as the "free culture movement". Extending the principles of the free and open-source software movement to all cultural and creative works, the free culture movement also encompasses the subset of the free music movement, which encourages unrestricted replication and dissemination. While facing criticism from copyright proponents, some scholars argue that the challenges in the news industry stem more from market dynamics than from the free culture movement itself. Unlike the free culture movement, the free art movement retains full copyright for artists, practicing art by leaving works in public

1. Summary The Free Culture Movement is a social movement aimed at promoting the distribution and modification of creative works in the form of free or open content, without the need for compensation or permission from the original authors. It opposes overly restrictive copyright laws and advocates for a culture of licensing. Lawrence Lessig is one of the prominent activists of this movement, whose actions sparked its rise following the passage of the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act in 1998. Organizations like the Creative Commons Foundation and student groups like FreeCulture.org are dedicated to seeking a fair balance that allows the public to use and engage with released creative works. 2. Interesting Point Individuals and organizations support the Free Culture Movement in various ways to foster continued innovation and dissemination of cultural creativity. Richard Stallman initially held a skeptical view of the movement, but over time, his perspective evolved from doubting

   1. Summary This passage discusses the challenges Wikipedia faces as an open content community and the complexities of reaching consensus in the decision-making process. My thoughts on these discussions are as follows: Cases of communication and disambiguation of misunderstandings: The article points out that Wikipedia, as an information repository and communication platform, often faces problems of misunderstanding and disambiguation. These misunderstandings can arise from real-world conflicts or disputes within a community. The article illustrates the problem of disambiguation, especially when article titles conflict. Difficulties with Consensus Decision-Making: Consensus is considered the primary mode of decision-making on Wikipedia, but reaching consensus is not always easy. The article mentions the complexity of consensus formation, including different understandings and the involvement of arbitration committees. Consensus requires in-depth discussion and investigation, and m

  1. Summary、 Culture is a way of life that is specific to a particular society and includes aspects such as norms, values, beliefs and symbols of expression. It encompasses anything that is given meaning or is given meaning within a group, and different cultures tend to assign different meanings to the same objects or symbols. Culture is dynamic; sometimes changes are slow and imperceptible, while at other times they are rapid and obvious. Under the influence of globalization, perceptions and attitudes towards things may change within cultures. At the heart of culture is the consideration of the differences between innate and acquired, developed through linguistic negotiation and development, making it an essential part of human life. Subcultures and countercultures, as well as ethnocentrism and cultural relativism, are equally important theories for solving social problems. Sociologists study culture through cultural sociology, focusing on how people create meaning in their lives fro

   1. Summary This article discusses in detail the multiple challenges faced by Wikipedia as an open content community and proposes corresponding solutions. First, the importance of transparency and integrity in building trust and cohesion was emphasized. By recording proposals, discussions, and decisions, Wikipedia demonstrates its transparency and provides participants with access to community protocols and culture. Secondly, the article talks about the importance of non-discrimination, pointing out that Wikipedia welcomes newcomers and adopts an inclusive attitude towards various contributors. In addition, the article also discusses the relationship between openness and rule making, community interaction, bureaucracy, etc., and deeply explores the impact of the formulation and changes of internal policies in the Wikipedia community on the community. At the same time, specific measures against damaging behaviors, such as robot rollback damage, page protection, etc., were also mentio

  1. summary The Wikipedia community, while valuing good faith and consensus in decision-making, remains relatively tolerant of the inherent ambiguities in collaborative encyclopedia work, trusting human judgment over time.  Although it faces real-world conflicts and unique challenges, Wikipedia hasn't become the global "adjustment and adjudication" institution Wells envisioned. Nonetheless, it serves as a fascinating example of historic community decision-making in a new context, especially due to its openness and the challenges it poses to consensus practice. These challenges are exemplified in humorous definitions of consensus and in scenarios like changing a light bulb on Wikipedia, showcasing the intricate processes involved.  Despite its frustrations, Wikipedia's consensus-building approach sometimes leads to unique solutions, although it can be hindered by irreconcilable differences or external threats. Thus, Wikipedia's leadership, epitomized by the "

 1.Summary This article talks about Wikipedia's openness.  Wikipedia has the characteristic of being a free and editable encyclopedia, but it raises the question of exactly what this openness means. The article describes Free and open-source software (FOSS). It is a software that freely licenses users to use, copy, study, change, and improve. It compares the concept of openness that stems from the FOSS with the real world of Wikipedia, talking about the pros and cons of Wikipedia's openness. Although it initially advocated the "ignore all rules" rule, it had to make up for the fact that it could be an exception under certain conditions. While an understanding of openness is often achieved in over-the-top and simplified ways, it suggests that some degree of structure and rules are needed in practice. Nevertheless, openness is important, as Wikipedia's success comes from an open community. For this reason, openness continues to be discussed in the community. 2. Inte

 1.SUMMARY Chapter 6 of the text delves into the concept of authorial leadership within open content communities like Wikipedia. It discusses the emergence of leadership despite the ethos of openness and egalitarianism. Jimmy Wales, one of Wikipedia's co-founders, serves as a prominent example of this leadership, exercising influence through persuasion and occasional autocratic actions. The chapter explores the dynamics between Wales and Larry Sanger, another co-founder, highlighting the tension between title and authority in a decentralized community. It emphasizes the importance of community values in shaping leadership roles and discusses Wales' leadership style, characterized by patience, civility, and a willingness to apologize. Despite occasional controversies, Wales' contributions to establishing Wikipedia's values are significant. He supports the community's governance evolution while encouraging other forms of leadership to emerge.  Overall, the chapter pro

  1) summarize in your own words of materials you read Culture is a social field of human life. In the past, culture was a boundary between elites and colony. It implied inequality. But as the time passed, the concept of culture changed. It still separates civilization and primitive, but it just distinguishes them rather than estimates them.  We should be careful about distinguishing cultures because distinguishing cultures can make culture relationship simple. Cultures are related systemically. 2) mention of any new, interesting, or unusual items learned It was interesting that instincts are formed by culture , and in this perspective, people who lived separately with other people make their own distinctive culture. I thought instincts are kind of innate things.  3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more In the material, subculture is a unite of neglected people and the quality of that

  Summary   The Wikipedia community is an open place where everyone participates in discussions and collaboration. It emphasizes the importance of openness, highlighting certain characteristics such as open content, transparent processes, fair treatment for all, and avoiding interference in others' activities. The author also mentions the history of the free software movement, illustrating the development of open content and Wikipedia's role within it. Overall, Wikipedia is a typical open community, demonstrating the importance and value of openness in practice. Interesting point    The challenge facing Wikipedia lies in striking a balance between the openness of allowing anyone to edit and the need to prevent abuse. While Wikipedia is open, it does not tolerate persistent disruptive behavior. The goal of Wikipedia is to produce a high-quality encyclopedia, which sometimes necessitates additional technical interventions to address harmful openness. While some may argue that Wik

1.Summary   This article discusses the characteristics of open content communities and provides a detailed description using Wikipedia as an example. The author first uses the term "community" to describe interdependent groups of people who participate in discussions, decision-making, and share some practices that define communities. Then, the author proposes five characteristics of an open content community: open content, transparency, integrity, non discrimination, and non interference. Although some of these features provide clear boundaries, such as copyright licenses for open content and forking ability, other features such as transparency, integrity, and non discriminatory social values do not provide equally clear boundaries. The author emphasizes that exploring these characteristics helps to understand the background and values in community discussions.   The article then provides a detailed introduction to the origins of the free and open source software movement and