W4.1 March 25 (Mon) -- Changyeop Jung
1.Summary
This article talks about Wikipedia's openness. Wikipedia has the characteristic of being a free and editable encyclopedia, but it raises the question of exactly what this openness means. The article describes Free and open-source software (FOSS). It is a software that freely licenses users to use, copy, study, change, and improve. It compares the concept of openness that stems from the FOSS with the real world of Wikipedia, talking about the pros and cons of Wikipedia's openness. Although it initially advocated the "ignore all rules" rule, it had to make up for the fact that it could be an exception under certain conditions. While an understanding of openness is often achieved in over-the-top and simplified ways, it suggests that some degree of structure and rules are needed in practice. Nevertheless, openness is important, as Wikipedia's success comes from an open community. For this reason, openness continues to be discussed in the community.
2. Interesting point
It is interesting that Wikipedia's open environment is a major issue as well as a driving force for their success. The scope of the rules for regulating openness should be discussed, and the rules should not compromise the benefits of existing openness. As Wikipedia's biggest feature is its openness, they must address this issue with importance in order for it to last longer in the future.
3. Question
Will Wikipedia's open environment help them discuss the issues of openness they face?
What is an appropriate example when comparing the openness of FOSS and Wikipedia?
ReplyDeleteWhat are the advantages and disadvantages of Wikipedia's openness?