W4.1 April 1 (Mon)

 a)While Wikipedia, as a wiki-style online encyclopedia, strives to provide accurate and reliable information, with the increase in mass editing and dissemination of information, fake news and misinformation can also appear in it. The ZJU hoax and a number of other hoaxes have appeared on Wikipedia, and these instances show that even a platform edited by a large number of volunteers can't completely eliminate the appearance of errors and fraud. Collective intelligence to fight misinformation requires first recognizing the possibility of its existence and responding to it accordingly. Here are some of the ways I have personally found effective:

1. Emphasize the importance of reliable sources: When editing Wikipedia or accessing information, priority should always be given to using sources from reliable, authoritative sources. These sources may include scholarly publications, professional journals, official reports, and trusted news organizations. By citing these sources, the accuracy and credibility of the information can be improved.

2. Critically assess the authenticity of information: Do not trust everything that appears on Wikipedia or other online platforms. When using or editing Wikipedia, one should cautiously assess the source, content and credibility of the information. If you come across dubious content, you should actively engage in error correction or challenge it.

3. Strengthen community monitoring and review mechanisms: Wikipedia has a community monitoring and review mechanism in which volunteers can participate to monitor the accuracy and quality of content. By strengthening the community monitoring and auditing mechanism, misinformation can be detected and corrected in a timely manner, improving the credibility of Wikipedia.

4. Educate and train volunteer editors: Wikipedia editors come from different backgrounds and levels, and some may lack the skills and awareness to verify information. Therefore, providing volunteer editors with relevant training and education to help them increase their awareness of the authenticity and credibility of information can help reduce the occurrence of misinformation.

5. Timely correction and updating of information: Once misinformation is found on Wikipedia, immediate action should be taken to correct and update it. Wikipedia encourages users to actively participate in editing and error correction, and through the power of collective wisdom, misinformation can be corrected in a timely manner to maintain the accuracy and credibility of the platform.

To summarize, collective wisdom can fight against misinformation and improve the quality of information on Wikipedia and other online platforms and reduce the occurrence of misinformation through measures such as strengthening source verification, prudent assessment, community supervision, education of editors and timely correction.


b）In the light of the first question I rethought the ways in which collective wisdom can combat misinformation. Important measures such as using reliable sources, judiciously evaluating information, increasing community oversight, educating editors and correcting information in a timely manner were emphasized. This has made me more aware that in the information age, each of us has a responsibility to participate in the process of ensuring the accuracy and credibility of information, and that collective intelligence is the key to achieving this goal.


c）Question of the Day:

When dealing with fake news and misinformation, how should we balance the free flow of information with ensuring its accuracy?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2024) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be...
Read more

W10.2 May 10 (Fri)—CHENG SHIYI

1.Summary   Remix culture is a culture that allows and encourages the creation of derivative works through the editing of existing material, challenges exclusive copyright restrictions, promotes the idea of remixing, and facilitates the free flow of creativity. In Remix, Lessig describes the shift from a read-only culture to a read/write culture, where the advent of digital technology has redefined the way culture is created and distributed in ways that facilitate the interactive relationship between producers and consumers and democratize the production of ideas and the distribution of content. The history of remix culture dates back to the 19th century, e.g.: according to American media scholar Henry Jenkins, but the balance between creation and consumption shifted with the advancement of analog recording and reproduction technologies.The analog era of the early 20th century, with its specialized creative equipment and cheap consumer devices, led to the strengthening of proprieta...
Read more

W1.1 Intro class: intro to class, blog, wiki and other assignments——CHENG SHIYI

1. Summary  I have taken classes from you, the professor, before and have always been interested in Wikipedia, so I chose to take your class this semester regardless. I understand from your introduction to all the courses in the lecture that this semester's Collective Intelligence in Practice course is centered around Wikipedia, which I understand is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and that Wikipedia brings together knowledge from around the world. One of the quotes in your course syllabus is that Technocrati's chief technologist says that soon "Wiki-knowledge will be a required job skill." Wikipedia, a non-profit encyclopedic website, is ranked among the top 5 most popular websites in the world, all thanks to a little bit of contribution from volunteers in the world. I see from this that the Collective Intelligence in Practice program understands Collective Intelligence on the Internet through Wikipedia from a sociological perspective. There are many ways to s...
Read more