W4.2 March 29 (Fri) —MU QING

  1. Summary

This passage discusses the challenges Wikipedia faces as an open content community and the complexities of reaching consensus in the decision-making process. My thoughts on these discussions are as follows:

Cases of communication and disambiguation of misunderstandings: The article points out that Wikipedia, as an information repository and communication platform, often faces problems of misunderstanding and disambiguation. These misunderstandings can arise from real-world conflicts or disputes within a community. The article illustrates the problem of disambiguation, especially when article titles conflict.

Difficulties with Consensus Decision-Making: Consensus is considered the primary mode of decision-making on Wikipedia, but reaching consensus is not always easy. The article mentions the complexity of consensus formation, including different understandings and the involvement of arbitration committees. Consensus requires in-depth discussion and investigation, and may face disagreements and challenges.

Time and Priority Management in Consensus-Based Communities: The discussion points out the challenges of determining consensus duration in consensus-based communities, and how to handle the end of discussions and reaching consensus. The article also mentions the role of moderators and facilitators in facilitating discussions and decision-making processes.

Comparison of consensus and voting: The article also compares consensus and voting, pointing out that consensus emphasizes discussion and compromise, while voting is more suitable for quantifying the opinions of large groups. However, voting can be subject to manipulation and unfairness.

Taken together, these texts highlight the importance of consensus building within the Wikipedia community and the challenges in the decision-making process. They also explore how consensus compares to other ways of making decisions, and the importance of managing time and priorities in consensus-based communities.


2. Interesting projects


The point I find interesting in these discussions is the comparison between consensus and voting. The article points out that although consensus is considered the preferred method of decision-making on Wikipedia because it emphasizes discussion and mutual compromise, in some cases voting may become one of the last resorts after consensus fails.

This leads to thinking about the respective advantages and disadvantages of consensus and voting. Consensus focuses more on discussion and understanding and can better reflect the true wishes of the participants, but may require more time and effort to achieve. Voting is more direct and can quickly obtain the majority opinion, but may ignore the opinions of a minority and face problems such as manipulation and unfairness.

This comparison provides an in-depth look at different decision-making styles and highlights the importance of choosing the most appropriate decision-making style in different situations. In open content communities such as Wikipedia, such discussions are critical to both transparency and fairness in the decision-making process.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2024) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be...
Read more

W10.2 May 10 (Fri)—CHENG SHIYI

1.Summary   Remix culture is a culture that allows and encourages the creation of derivative works through the editing of existing material, challenges exclusive copyright restrictions, promotes the idea of remixing, and facilitates the free flow of creativity. In Remix, Lessig describes the shift from a read-only culture to a read/write culture, where the advent of digital technology has redefined the way culture is created and distributed in ways that facilitate the interactive relationship between producers and consumers and democratize the production of ideas and the distribution of content. The history of remix culture dates back to the 19th century, e.g.: according to American media scholar Henry Jenkins, but the balance between creation and consumption shifted with the advancement of analog recording and reproduction technologies.The analog era of the early 20th century, with its specialized creative equipment and cheap consumer devices, led to the strengthening of proprieta...
Read more

W1.1 Intro class: intro to class, blog, wiki and other assignments——CHENG SHIYI

1. Summary  I have taken classes from you, the professor, before and have always been interested in Wikipedia, so I chose to take your class this semester regardless. I understand from your introduction to all the courses in the lecture that this semester's Collective Intelligence in Practice course is centered around Wikipedia, which I understand is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and that Wikipedia brings together knowledge from around the world. One of the quotes in your course syllabus is that Technocrati's chief technologist says that soon "Wiki-knowledge will be a required job skill." Wikipedia, a non-profit encyclopedic website, is ranked among the top 5 most popular websites in the world, all thanks to a little bit of contribution from volunteers in the world. I see from this that the Collective Intelligence in Practice program understands Collective Intelligence on the Internet through Wikipedia from a sociological perspective. There are many ways to s...
Read more