W15.2 June 14 (Fri)--Changyeop Jung

 1.Summary

The Manual of Style (MoS or MOS) for Wikipedia provides guidelines to ensure articles are clear, consistent, and well-organized. It is a reference tool meant to guide editors in formatting articles properly, though it does not need to be memorized. When unsure about formatting, editors can refer to the MoS or look at well-written articles for examples. It’s important to prioritize content over formatting, and to welcome help from other editors in good faith.

Articles should start with a brief summary of the topic and then provide more detailed information in logically organized sections with clear headings. The lead section is the first part of an article, appearing before the table of contents and any headings. It should succinctly define the topic, highlight its significance, and summarize the key points in one to four paragraphs. The lead should be written in an accessible style to encourage further reading and should include citations for any important information not covered elsewhere in the article.

Articles are structured into sections and subsections, each with a brief heading that appears in the table of contents. Headings typically avoid starting with "the" or "a" and do not repeat the article's title. They generally follow sentence case, where only the first word is capitalized. The article's title serves as the first-level heading, generated automatically, while the main sections start at the second level (==Heading 2==) and can be broken down into third-level subsections (===Heading 3===) and so on. It is important not to skip levels; for example, a third-level heading should follow a second-level heading.

2.Interesting things

Wikipedia's Manual of Style (MoS or MOS) has several intriguing elements that reflect its unique approach to maintaining consistency and clarity. First, the MoS is not a set of rigid rules but a flexible guideline, allowing diverse topics and editing styles to coexist while maintaining a unified format. Second, it emphasizes the importance of the lead section, which provides a concise summary of the article's key points, ensuring readers can quickly grasp the topic. This strategic focus on the lead helps engage readers who may not delve into the entire article. Third, the MoS mandates a sequential structure for headings, which ensures a clear hierarchy of information, making it easier for readers to navigate and understand complex topics. Fourth, it promotes a collaborative and positive editing environment by encouraging the principle of "assume good faith," fostering mutual respect and constructive feedback among editors. Lastly, the MoS prioritizes content over formatting, guiding editors to focus on delivering valuable and informative content. These aspects illustrate how the MoS helps Wikipedia maintain a reliable, user-friendly, and inclusive platform for sharing knowledge.

3.Question

Why does the Manual of Style emphasize flexibility over rigid rules, and how does this impact the quality and consistency of Wikipedia articles?

What is the rationale behind the MoS's emphasis on the lead section, and how does it affect reader engagement and understanding?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2024) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be...
Read more

W10.2 May 10 (Fri)—CHENG SHIYI

1.Summary   Remix culture is a culture that allows and encourages the creation of derivative works through the editing of existing material, challenges exclusive copyright restrictions, promotes the idea of remixing, and facilitates the free flow of creativity. In Remix, Lessig describes the shift from a read-only culture to a read/write culture, where the advent of digital technology has redefined the way culture is created and distributed in ways that facilitate the interactive relationship between producers and consumers and democratize the production of ideas and the distribution of content. The history of remix culture dates back to the 19th century, e.g.: according to American media scholar Henry Jenkins, but the balance between creation and consumption shifted with the advancement of analog recording and reproduction technologies.The analog era of the early 20th century, with its specialized creative equipment and cheap consumer devices, led to the strengthening of proprieta...
Read more

W1.1 Intro class: intro to class, blog, wiki and other assignments——CHENG SHIYI

1. Summary  I have taken classes from you, the professor, before and have always been interested in Wikipedia, so I chose to take your class this semester regardless. I understand from your introduction to all the courses in the lecture that this semester's Collective Intelligence in Practice course is centered around Wikipedia, which I understand is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and that Wikipedia brings together knowledge from around the world. One of the quotes in your course syllabus is that Technocrati's chief technologist says that soon "Wiki-knowledge will be a required job skill." Wikipedia, a non-profit encyclopedic website, is ranked among the top 5 most popular websites in the world, all thanks to a little bit of contribution from volunteers in the world. I see from this that the Collective Intelligence in Practice program understands Collective Intelligence on the Internet through Wikipedia from a sociological perspective. There are many ways to s...
Read more