W5.2 April 5 (Fri) -Hong gyeongmin

 

1) 

Wikipidia discusses controversies surrounding the normativity of reference works like dictionaries and encyclopedias, focusing on their perceived authority, marketing strategies, and implications for societal norms and credibility. It explores ideological biases in reference works, citing examples like Conservapedia's opposition to perceived liberal bias in Wikipedia and historical instances of bias. Additionally, it delves into the complexities of knowledge production, contrasting views on collective intelligence theories and questioning whether access to encyclopedic production should be limited to those with established credentials. Furthermore, it examines the universal encyclopedic vision, its aspiration for expansive knowledge production and accessibility, and critics' skepticism about its success, reflecting broader discussions on modernity, technology, and knowledge dissemination.


2) 

It was intriguing to see Wikipedia categorizing biased articles due to its role as a popular reference source for children. One historical example mentioned in the text highlights how interpretations of historical events can vary widely from country to country or person to person. Therefore, a clear stance from the author is necessary. However, encyclopedias serve as mirrors of contemporary learning, offering opportunities to examine various perspectives. Thus, Wikipedia's debates could potentially lead to positive outcomes, fostering new forms of sharing or collaboration.


3)

If you look on Wikipedia, you can find debates about reference works from the past. In your opinion, what are the reasons for these debates occurring

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

W10.2 May 10 (Fri)—CHENG SHIYI

How to make sure content you add to Wikipedia is not a copyright violation?—— LI MENGRU

W1.1 Intro class: intro to class, blog, wiki and other assignments——CHENG SHIYI