W6.1

 1) Neutrality should be perceived not merely as a characteristic of an encyclopedia, but rather as an aspiration and intentional stance of its contributors. It's crucial to embrace universal ideals such as openness, good faith, and impartiality, akin to the viewpoint of the contributor. For instance, within online communities, inherent tensions and practical challenges exist, shaping the dynamics of open content platforms.

Discussing the application of Godwin's Law to online communities sheds light on the tendency for conflicts to escalate, often resulting in extreme comparisons like invoking Nazi analogies. Despite Wikipedia's noble objectives, it remains susceptible to the flaws inherent in human nature, as observed by journalist Stacy Schiff. Nevertheless, Wikipedia's collaborative ethos, marked by positive norms such as "Don't Bite the Newcomers" and "Assume Good Faith," serves to mitigate conflicts and foster cooperation. While technology facilitates collaboration on platforms like Wikipedia, their success predominantly hinges on the strength of their collaborative culture rather than solely on their technological underpinnings, as underscored by Larry Sanger.

Criticism directed towards Wikipedia and "Web 2.0" often revolves around debates concerning the significance of community and culture within Wikipedia. This is intrinsically tied to the argument that Wikipedia's success stems primarily from its collaborative culture, rather than just its technological infrastructure. As Wikipedia continues to evolve, criticisms are anticipated, yet its trajectory is expected to be one of ongoing development and expansion.


2) This article introduced me to Godwin's Law, which elucidates the tendency for Nazi-related metaphors to arise with prolonged exposure to online discussions. It prompted me to contemplate whether scenarios akin to Godwin's Law manifest in realms beyond the internet. Political debates immediately come to mind as a pertinent example. Political discourse often strategically emphasizes certain issues to bolster one's argument while downplaying others, which can inadvertently lead to extreme comparisons akin to invoking Nazi imagery.


3) Have you encountered instances where Godwin's Law has been invoked in online interactions?

Comments

  1. Huang YanhanApril 13, 2024 at 5:40 AM

    Yes, Godwin's Law is a well-known observation about online discussions. It states that as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1. This means that in any sufficiently long online conversation, someone is likely to bring up comparisons to Nazis or Hitler, often in an attempt to discredit an opponent's argument. This phenomenon has been observed in various online forums, social media platforms, and comment sections, where discussions can quickly devolve into inflammatory rhetoric. While it's often used humorously or ironically, it can also derail constructive dialogue and escalate tensions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10.2 May 10 (Fri)—CHENG SHIYI

1.Summary   Remix culture is a culture that allows and encourages the creation of derivative works through the editing of existing material, challenges exclusive copyright restrictions, promotes the idea of remixing, and facilitates the free flow of creativity. In Remix, Lessig describes the shift from a read-only culture to a read/write culture, where the advent of digital technology has redefined the way culture is created and distributed in ways that facilitate the interactive relationship between producers and consumers and democratize the production of ideas and the distribution of content. The history of remix culture dates back to the 19th century, e.g.: according to American media scholar Henry Jenkins, but the balance between creation and consumption shifted with the advancement of analog recording and reproduction technologies.The analog era of the early 20th century, with its specialized creative equipment and cheap consumer devices, led to the strengthening of proprieta...
Read more

How to make sure content you add to Wikipedia is not a copyright violation?—— LI MENGRU

1.Summary Firstly, we can use as much content as possible that is clearly released under free copyright licenses or is in the public domain. This content is typically available on dedicated free material websites, such as Wikimedia Commons, Pixabay, Unsplash, and others. Doing so can help avoid copyright disputes and ensure that the content we add is lawful. Secondly, if we wish to use others' work on Wikipedia, we must reach out to the copyright holders and request permission. This may require communication with the authors or copyright owners and obtaining written permission or usage agreements. Only after obtaining authorization can we use these works on Wikipedia. Additionally, we can choose to create our own original content and add it to Wikipedia. This not only helps avoid copyright issues but also contributes new and valuable content to Wikipedia. We can generate original content through independent research, interviews, or creation to enrich Wikipedia's information res...
Read more

W1.1 Intro class: intro to class, blog, wiki and other assignments——CHENG SHIYI

1. Summary  I have taken classes from you, the professor, before and have always been interested in Wikipedia, so I chose to take your class this semester regardless. I understand from your introduction to all the courses in the lecture that this semester's Collective Intelligence in Practice course is centered around Wikipedia, which I understand is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and that Wikipedia brings together knowledge from around the world. One of the quotes in your course syllabus is that Technocrati's chief technologist says that soon "Wiki-knowledge will be a required job skill." Wikipedia, a non-profit encyclopedic website, is ranked among the top 5 most popular websites in the world, all thanks to a little bit of contribution from volunteers in the world. I see from this that the Collective Intelligence in Practice program understands Collective Intelligence on the Internet through Wikipedia from a sociological perspective. There are many ways to s...
Read more