W9.1 April 29 (Mon)—ZHONG XIN

1.Summary

The content of this page reveals various hoaxes and disinformation that have appeared on Wikipedia, including a range of information on Wikipedia that has been proven to be false or misleading. This information may have been inserted into Wikipedia entries as a result of malicious editing, misrepresentation, or other reasons, but the Wikipedia community usually takes active steps to detect and correct these problems. The false information may involve biographies of people, descriptions of historical events, statements of scientific theories, and so on. This page provides an important reference for the review and evaluation of the content of Wikipedia entries by documenting the details of these hoaxes. The page lists the specifics of each hoax, including when it was recognized, corrective measures, and so on. Overall, the purpose of this page is to remind readers to be cautious when using Wikipedia, not to blindly trust the information, and the need for proper validation and verification of the content.

2. Interesting Point

The existence of this page reflects the Wikipedia community's ability to self-correct and correct information. Precisely because Wikipedia is an open editing platform, it is more susceptible to malicious editing or misinterpretation, but through the community's concerted efforts and monitoring, false information is often quickly detected and corrected. This self-correcting mechanism demonstrates the reliability of Wikipedia as an open knowledge-sharing platform.

3. Discussion

Do hoaxes and false information on Wikipedia affect the public's trust and attitude towards using the knowledge-sharing platform? Does it lead to a weakening of public trust in Wikipedia?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2024) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be...
Read more

W10.2 May 10 (Fri)—CHENG SHIYI

1.Summary   Remix culture is a culture that allows and encourages the creation of derivative works through the editing of existing material, challenges exclusive copyright restrictions, promotes the idea of remixing, and facilitates the free flow of creativity. In Remix, Lessig describes the shift from a read-only culture to a read/write culture, where the advent of digital technology has redefined the way culture is created and distributed in ways that facilitate the interactive relationship between producers and consumers and democratize the production of ideas and the distribution of content. The history of remix culture dates back to the 19th century, e.g.: according to American media scholar Henry Jenkins, but the balance between creation and consumption shifted with the advancement of analog recording and reproduction technologies.The analog era of the early 20th century, with its specialized creative equipment and cheap consumer devices, led to the strengthening of proprieta...
Read more

W1.1 Intro class: intro to class, blog, wiki and other assignments——CHENG SHIYI

1. Summary  I have taken classes from you, the professor, before and have always been interested in Wikipedia, so I chose to take your class this semester regardless. I understand from your introduction to all the courses in the lecture that this semester's Collective Intelligence in Practice course is centered around Wikipedia, which I understand is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and that Wikipedia brings together knowledge from around the world. One of the quotes in your course syllabus is that Technocrati's chief technologist says that soon "Wiki-knowledge will be a required job skill." Wikipedia, a non-profit encyclopedic website, is ranked among the top 5 most popular websites in the world, all thanks to a little bit of contribution from volunteers in the world. I see from this that the Collective Intelligence in Practice program understands Collective Intelligence on the Internet through Wikipedia from a sociological perspective. There are many ways to s...
Read more