W10.2 May 10 Assignment (Fri) ZHANGQI
Assignment1:When you search for information, do you prefer to use AI or Wikipedia? Why?
I tend to use artificial intelligence. Although Wikipedia provides rich information, I prefer the search method of artificial intelligence because it can interact with me through dialogue and quickly obtain the information I need. And in certain specific cases, Wikipedia may not be able to find the information I need, because some information, although included in Wikipedia, may not be complete in content. But artificial intelligence can give me more complete information. So I prefer to use artificial intelligence to search for information.
The answer given by AI to question1:
I tend to use Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia edited by volunteers, covering a wide range of topics and providing reliable sources of information. Although it may not be as intelligent or flexible as artificial intelligence, the information it provides is often rigorously reviewed and edited, so I am more inclined to trust the content it provides. In addition, the content of Wikipedia is usually more detailed and comprehensive, suitable for a deeper understanding of a certain topic.
Assignment2:
I believe that Wikipedia content should not be created through AI. Because the first article mentioned a point where Wikipedians like Knipel image that ChatGPT could be used on Wikipedia as a tool without removing the role of humanity I think what he said is right. As humans, I believe we need the help of AI to complete Wikipedia editing more quickly and efficiently. But if all Wikipedia content is handed over to AI, humans will repent of being too lazy, which will reduce their thinking. This means human degradation.
Additionally, I would like to quote a passage from this article: Andrew Lih, the Wikimedia at target at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington and a volunteer Wikipedia editor since 2003, agreed that much of the potential for ChatGPT lies in overcoming that initial inertia and finding the "activation energy" to write a new article for the encyclopedia "Wikipedia are not lagging for motivation or passage, but just the time," he said.
The second article also discusses how artificial intelligence has torn apart Wikipedia. This paragraph is a concern of humanity, and I think this concern is very reasonable. The concern is that machine-generated content has to be balanced with a lot of human review and would overwhelm lesser-known wikis with bad content. While AI generators are useful for writing believable, human-like text, they are also prone to including erroneous information, and even citing sources and academic papers which don’t exist. This often results in text summaries which seem accurate, but on closer inspection are revealed to be completely fabricated.
Assignment3:
It is mainly divided into two parts:
1. Artificial intelligence for Wikimedia projects
2. Using Wikimedia projects for artificial intelligence
The Wikipedia community has transformed artificial intelligence, and through the rational use of Wikipedia community members, the interaction between artificial intelligence and Wikimedia has had many positive impacts.Wikipedia has made significant contributions to the use of textual symbols, as well as text production and translation. It has changed the traditional translation mode, making communication between people around the world easier. Even though AI's use of text may not be as excellent as humans, it has already reached a high level of proficiency.However, the use of artificial intelligence must be reasonable. According to the third article, AI often creates false information that is difficult to distinguish. This means that we need to know that artificial intelligence is just a tool and cannot completely replace Wikipedia.
Assignment4:
Comments
Post a Comment