W13.2 May 31(Fri) Kim seoyoung

 1.Summary

This introduction raises questions about why some individuals continue to teach beliefs about human anatomy that do not align with empirical evidence, why we have two names for the same genital organ, and why it matters which name we use for which person. It also questions why an inaccurate version of human biological variation is promoted and why people believe in these constructs. Additionally, it explores the consequences of these beliefs in sex and gender for individuals and society.

2.Interesting point

One intriguing aspect is the distinction between gender and sex, and how society's perceptions and categorizations of these concepts impact individuals' lives. Additionally, the discussion on the fluidity and complexity of human biology, particularly regarding sex, challenges conventional understandings and raises questions about the social construction of gender and sex categories. Moreover, the historical and cultural context surrounding the acceptance or rejection of transgender and intersex individuals sheds light on societal attitudes towards gender diversity.

3.Discussion

I'd like to delve deeper into the societal implications of the discrepancies between gender and sex categorizations. Exploring how these constructs influence various aspects of individuals' lives, such as healthcare access, legal recognition, and social acceptance, could provide valuable insights into addressing gender-based inequalities. Additionally, discussing strategies for promoting greater understanding and inclusivity for transgender and intersex individuals in different cultural and institutional contexts could be enlightening.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2024) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be...
Read more

W10.2 May 10 (Fri)—CHENG SHIYI

1.Summary   Remix culture is a culture that allows and encourages the creation of derivative works through the editing of existing material, challenges exclusive copyright restrictions, promotes the idea of remixing, and facilitates the free flow of creativity. In Remix, Lessig describes the shift from a read-only culture to a read/write culture, where the advent of digital technology has redefined the way culture is created and distributed in ways that facilitate the interactive relationship between producers and consumers and democratize the production of ideas and the distribution of content. The history of remix culture dates back to the 19th century, e.g.: according to American media scholar Henry Jenkins, but the balance between creation and consumption shifted with the advancement of analog recording and reproduction technologies.The analog era of the early 20th century, with its specialized creative equipment and cheap consumer devices, led to the strengthening of proprieta...
Read more

W1.1 Intro class: intro to class, blog, wiki and other assignments——CHENG SHIYI

1. Summary  I have taken classes from you, the professor, before and have always been interested in Wikipedia, so I chose to take your class this semester regardless. I understand from your introduction to all the courses in the lecture that this semester's Collective Intelligence in Practice course is centered around Wikipedia, which I understand is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and that Wikipedia brings together knowledge from around the world. One of the quotes in your course syllabus is that Technocrati's chief technologist says that soon "Wiki-knowledge will be a required job skill." Wikipedia, a non-profit encyclopedic website, is ranked among the top 5 most popular websites in the world, all thanks to a little bit of contribution from volunteers in the world. I see from this that the Collective Intelligence in Practice program understands Collective Intelligence on the Internet through Wikipedia from a sociological perspective. There are many ways to s...
Read more