W13.2 May 31(Fri)—HUANGQIHAO

 1.Summary

 This article explores Wikipedia's classification system, an important tool for organizing and building content that helps readers and editors find information more easily. Categories make it easier to navigate and find information by grouping similar items together. Although classification is not the only way to navigate, it has an important place in Wikipedia. The basic principles of the classification system include accuracy, non-overlap, avoiding over-classification, and ensuring that each entry is properly grouped. Categories should be subject oriented rather than overly superficial descriptions.

Wikipedia's classification structure is hierarchical. The top categories are relatively broad, such as "sociological," while the categories become more specific as you go further down the hierarchy, such as "lower agricultural society" or "industrial society." An entry can belong to more than one category in order to be found in different contexts. Category names should be clear, concise, and descriptive, avoiding abbreviations or ambiguous terms.

Maintaining classifications requires ongoing effort, including regular reviews of classifications for accuracy and relevance. This ensures that Wikipedia's classification system remains effective and useful, providing users with a better information finding experience.

2.Interesting Point
 Wikipedia's classification system uses a hierarchical structure, with the top categories being relatively broad and the categories becoming more specific as the hierarchy goes deeper. This hierarchical structure helps organize information in more detail, making it easier for users to find content that interests them.
3.Discussion
In Wikipedia's classification system, how do you ensure that each entry is properly classified? Especially when it comes to complex or diverse topics, there may be situations where classification is vague or inaccurate.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2024) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be...
Read more

W10.2 May 10 (Fri)—CHENG SHIYI

1.Summary   Remix culture is a culture that allows and encourages the creation of derivative works through the editing of existing material, challenges exclusive copyright restrictions, promotes the idea of remixing, and facilitates the free flow of creativity. In Remix, Lessig describes the shift from a read-only culture to a read/write culture, where the advent of digital technology has redefined the way culture is created and distributed in ways that facilitate the interactive relationship between producers and consumers and democratize the production of ideas and the distribution of content. The history of remix culture dates back to the 19th century, e.g.: according to American media scholar Henry Jenkins, but the balance between creation and consumption shifted with the advancement of analog recording and reproduction technologies.The analog era of the early 20th century, with its specialized creative equipment and cheap consumer devices, led to the strengthening of proprieta...
Read more

W1.1 Intro class: intro to class, blog, wiki and other assignments——CHENG SHIYI

1. Summary  I have taken classes from you, the professor, before and have always been interested in Wikipedia, so I chose to take your class this semester regardless. I understand from your introduction to all the courses in the lecture that this semester's Collective Intelligence in Practice course is centered around Wikipedia, which I understand is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and that Wikipedia brings together knowledge from around the world. One of the quotes in your course syllabus is that Technocrati's chief technologist says that soon "Wiki-knowledge will be a required job skill." Wikipedia, a non-profit encyclopedic website, is ranked among the top 5 most popular websites in the world, all thanks to a little bit of contribution from volunteers in the world. I see from this that the Collective Intelligence in Practice program understands Collective Intelligence on the Internet through Wikipedia from a sociological perspective. There are many ways to s...
Read more