W8.1 April 22 (Mon) —— WANG YUERONG

 Summary

Wikipedia has strict standards for reliable sources and provides detailed guidelines to help editors and readers identify and assess the credibility of information sources. Firstly, Wikipedia emphasizes restrictions on dubious sources and sponsored content, including extremist websites, sponsored content, and self-published materials. Secondly, self-published sources are deemed unreliable, especially when involving independent information about others. Thirdly, Wikipedia does not accept user-generated content as sources due to their lack of editorial oversight and fact-checking. In specific cases, Wikipedia provides guidance on different types of sources, including what editors should consider in biographies of living persons, medical claims, academic consensus, and more. Finally, Wikipedia explicitly states that deprecated sources should not be used to support factual statements, as these sources are often deprecated due to historical fabrication or other serious issues. Overall, Wikipedia's goal is to ensure that its articles use reliable, fact-checked sources to enhance accuracy and credibility, thereby maintaining its reputation as a trusted knowledge platform.

Interesting Points

This material highlights Wikipedia's strict standards for information sources. It emphasizes Wikipedia's commitment to reliability and accuracy, as well as the guidelines that must be followed when editing and writing articles. Wikipedia requires the use of reliable, verified sources and imposes restrictions on self-published, sponsored, and user-generated content sources. Additionally, it warns against the use of deprecated sources and provides specific guidance on how to handle different types of sources in specific situations. This cautious and rigorous approach sets Wikipedia apart in the realm of online information, enhancing its credibility as a knowledge platform.

Discussion points

Should consideration be given to the author's expertise and reputation rather than just the material's source when it comes to self-published sources? Additionally, how should the presentation of fringe theories be balanced with mainstream viewpoints?

Comments

  1. ChoisieonJune 3, 2024 at 8:08 AM

    What are the key guidelines and principles outlined by Wikipedia regarding the use of reliable sources, and how do these guidelines contribute to the platform's goal of maintaining accuracy and credibility?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10.2 May 10 (Fri)—CHENG SHIYI

1.Summary   Remix culture is a culture that allows and encourages the creation of derivative works through the editing of existing material, challenges exclusive copyright restrictions, promotes the idea of remixing, and facilitates the free flow of creativity. In Remix, Lessig describes the shift from a read-only culture to a read/write culture, where the advent of digital technology has redefined the way culture is created and distributed in ways that facilitate the interactive relationship between producers and consumers and democratize the production of ideas and the distribution of content. The history of remix culture dates back to the 19th century, e.g.: according to American media scholar Henry Jenkins, but the balance between creation and consumption shifted with the advancement of analog recording and reproduction technologies.The analog era of the early 20th century, with its specialized creative equipment and cheap consumer devices, led to the strengthening of proprieta...
Read more

W1.1 Intro class: intro to class, blog, wiki and other assignments——CHENG SHIYI

1. Summary  I have taken classes from you, the professor, before and have always been interested in Wikipedia, so I chose to take your class this semester regardless. I understand from your introduction to all the courses in the lecture that this semester's Collective Intelligence in Practice course is centered around Wikipedia, which I understand is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and that Wikipedia brings together knowledge from around the world. One of the quotes in your course syllabus is that Technocrati's chief technologist says that soon "Wiki-knowledge will be a required job skill." Wikipedia, a non-profit encyclopedic website, is ranked among the top 5 most popular websites in the world, all thanks to a little bit of contribution from volunteers in the world. I see from this that the Collective Intelligence in Practice program understands Collective Intelligence on the Internet through Wikipedia from a sociological perspective. There are many ways to s...
Read more

W4.1 March 25 (Mon)——LI MENGRU

1.Summary   This article discusses the characteristics of open content communities and provides a detailed description using Wikipedia as an example. The author first uses the term "community" to describe interdependent groups of people who participate in discussions, decision-making, and share some practices that define communities. Then, the author proposes five characteristics of an open content community: open content, transparency, integrity, non discrimination, and non interference. Although some of these features provide clear boundaries, such as copyright licenses for open content and forking ability, other features such as transparency, integrity, and non discriminatory social values do not provide equally clear boundaries. The author emphasizes that exploring these characteristics helps to understand the background and values in community discussions.   The article then provides a detailed introduction to the origins of the free and open source software movement and...
Read more