Week 13.2 May 31 (Fri)—MUQING

  1. Summary

After reading the article "Wikipedia: Categorization," I gained a deeper understanding of Wikipedia's categorization system. This system is not just about simply classifying entries; it is actually a carefully designed structured network aimed at enhancing users' browsing and searching experiences.

Firstly, the hierarchical structure of the categorization system is very intuitive, similar to a tree diagram. From main categories to subcategories, and then to even more specific sub-subcategories, each level brings users closer to the information they are seeking. This layered approach not only makes information more organized but also helps users locate related content more quickly.

Secondly, the article explains the creation and usage of categories. Any user can participate in creating categories, but they need to follow certain guidelines to maintain the system's orderliness and efficiency. This reflects the openness and collaborative spirit of the Wikipedia community, while also emphasizing the importance of the categorization system.

Maintaining and improving categories is an ongoing process. By regularly checking and adjusting categories, ensuring each entry is in the right place, the accuracy and usability of the entire system can be improved. The article mentions some tools and bots, such as AutoWikiBrowser and HotCat, which show that Wikipedia has made significant technical efforts to assist in categorization tasks.

The article also discusses naming conventions and the scope of categories, which ensure the rigor and usability of the categorization system. Through reasonable naming and layering, users can understand and use the categorization system more clearly.

This article made me realize that Wikipedia's categorization system is not just for convenient information retrieval, but also a reflection of community collaboration and knowledge sharing. It requires the participation and contribution of every user to continuously improve and develop. Through this collaboration, Wikipedia maintains its status as a global knowledge repository and demonstrates the power of collective wisdom.


2. Interesting projects


After reading the article "Wikipedia: Categorization," I found several particularly interesting points that gave me a new understanding of Wikipedia's categorization system.

First, Wikipedia's categorization system is a hierarchical structure, which reminded me of a tree diagram. Each category has its place, from main categories to subcategories and then to more specific sub-subcategories. This structure is not only intuitive but also very helpful for users to quickly find the information they need. This made me realize that categorization is not just simple classification but a carefully designed network that helps users browse and search more efficiently.

Second, any registered user can participate in the creation and maintenance of categories. This open mechanism reflects the collaborative spirit of the Wikipedia community. Everyone can contribute to this vast information network, ensuring the accuracy and usability of the categorization system. This openness and collaboration make Wikipedia not just a knowledge repository but a platform built and maintained by users worldwide.

The maintenance and improvement of categorization also caught my interest. Wikipedia provides tools and bots, such as AutoWikiBrowser and HotCat, to help users with categorization tasks. These tools not only improve work efficiency but also ensure the accuracy and consistency of categorization. Using technological means to assist in category maintenance is highly efficient, showcasing the important role of technology in knowledge management.

Additionally, the naming conventions and scope of categories are also interesting aspects. Each category name needs to be concise and usually in the singular form to avoid ambiguity. These strict naming conventions show Wikipedia's rigorous approach to organizing information. Reasonable category scopes and hierarchies not only help users better understand the information but also ensure the orderliness and usability of the categorization system.

This article made me appreciate the complexity and ingenious design of Wikipedia's categorization system. Through its hierarchical structure, open participation mechanism, technological tools, and strict naming conventions, Wikipedia's categorization system not only helps users find information more effectively but also demonstrates the power of collective wisdom and collaboration. These intriguing points deepened my respect for Wikipedia and sparked my interest in knowledge organization and management.


3.Question:

Why does Wikipedia need to regularly maintain and improve its categorization system? How does this affect the system's accuracy and usability?

Comments

  1. HongGyeongminMay 30, 2024 at 8:52 PM

    Wikipedia regularly maintains and improves its categorization system to manage content growth, enhance user navigation, and ensure quality control. This process involves adapting to new knowledge and trends to keep the system relevant. Improved categorization accuracy reduces errors and ambiguity, while better usability aids in efficient information retrieval and a user-friendly interface. This also facilitates contributor collaboration and community involvement in content creation. Regular updates ensure structural integrity, with balanced category distribution and coherent hierarchical organization.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2024) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be...
Read more

W10.2 May 10 (Fri)—CHENG SHIYI

1.Summary   Remix culture is a culture that allows and encourages the creation of derivative works through the editing of existing material, challenges exclusive copyright restrictions, promotes the idea of remixing, and facilitates the free flow of creativity. In Remix, Lessig describes the shift from a read-only culture to a read/write culture, where the advent of digital technology has redefined the way culture is created and distributed in ways that facilitate the interactive relationship between producers and consumers and democratize the production of ideas and the distribution of content. The history of remix culture dates back to the 19th century, e.g.: according to American media scholar Henry Jenkins, but the balance between creation and consumption shifted with the advancement of analog recording and reproduction technologies.The analog era of the early 20th century, with its specialized creative equipment and cheap consumer devices, led to the strengthening of proprieta...
Read more

W1.1 Intro class: intro to class, blog, wiki and other assignments——CHENG SHIYI

1. Summary  I have taken classes from you, the professor, before and have always been interested in Wikipedia, so I chose to take your class this semester regardless. I understand from your introduction to all the courses in the lecture that this semester's Collective Intelligence in Practice course is centered around Wikipedia, which I understand is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and that Wikipedia brings together knowledge from around the world. One of the quotes in your course syllabus is that Technocrati's chief technologist says that soon "Wiki-knowledge will be a required job skill." Wikipedia, a non-profit encyclopedic website, is ranked among the top 5 most popular websites in the world, all thanks to a little bit of contribution from volunteers in the world. I see from this that the Collective Intelligence in Practice program understands Collective Intelligence on the Internet through Wikipedia from a sociological perspective. There are many ways to s...
Read more