W15.2 June 14 (Fri)——WANG YUERONG
1.Summary
This semester, I diligently participated in the task of editing Wikipedia, which has given me new perspectives on academic assignments. Firstly, compared to traditional classroom tasks, editing Wikipedia introduced me to a completely different learning method and experience.
In traditional assignments, we typically demonstrate our understanding and grasp of course content to our teachers. These assignments are often aimed at achieving specific grade standards and typically end upon completion. Editing Wikipedia, however, is entirely different. It requires our contributions to be public, accessible, and usable by people worldwide. This openness makes me feel that my efforts can have an impact on a broader community, rather than just aiming for a score.
Secondly, editing Wikipedia has taught me how to collaborate with others and to respect and adhere to the community's norms and guidelines. During the editing process, I'm not just completing a task but participating in a community-driven creation. I engage in discussions, exchanges with like-minded editors, and accept suggestions and feedback from them. This collaborative process has allowed me to experience the power of collective wisdom and teamwork.
Most importantly, editing Wikipedia has been enjoyable. Compared to traditional assignments, I find editing on Wikipedia more engaging and fulfilling. Seeing my contributions published in real-time and potentially helpful to readers worldwide gives me a sense of accomplishment that traditional assignments cannot match. Editing Wikipedia is not just an academic task; it's a way to facilitate knowledge sharing and global connectivity.
Additionally, editing Wikipedia has taught me to conduct research and citations more rigorously and meticulously. Every edit and addition requires reliance on reliable sources and facts, which has not only enhanced my academic writing skills but also fostered a deeper appreciation for the authenticity of information.
In conclusion, editing Wikipedia has not only provided me with a new learning experience but also challenged my traditional views on academic tasks. It emphasizes openness, collaboration, and real-time engagement, deepening my understanding of the significance of academic work. As I continue my academic journey, I will cherish my experience of editing Wikipedia and strive to make further progress and contributions on the path of global knowledge sharing.
2.Interesting Point
One of the most intriguing aspects of editing Wikipedia is the real-time impact it can have on global knowledge. Unlike traditional assignments that are often confined to a classroom or academic setting, editing Wikipedia allows for immediate publication of contributions that are accessible to anyone with an internet connection. This means that within moments of making an edit, I could potentially be influencing readers from diverse backgrounds and locations around the world. This dynamic and interactive nature of Wikipedia editing adds a layer of excitement and relevance to the academic process that is hard to replicate in more traditional assignments.
3.Discussion
During my experience editing Wikipedia, I encountered some areas that prompted me to ponder. Particularly in maintaining accuracy, neutrality, and verifiability, I found these challenges to be quite nuanced. For instance, how does one balance differing perspectives on the same topic among editors? When faced with insufficient sources or disputes, how does one make informed decisions? These questions not only involve academic research skills but also encompass the complexities of effectively disseminating and managing knowledge on a global platform.
Moreover, I questioned whether editing Wikipedia influences public perceptions of specific topics, and how this influence evolves and spreads globally. These are pertinent issues worthy of deeper exploration.
These reflections underscore that participating in Wikipedia editing goes beyond mere content submission; it requires ongoing learning and reflection to navigate an increasingly complex and dynamic information landscape. By discussing these issues, I aim to gain a deeper understanding of the significance of Wikipedia as an open and community-driven knowledge platform, and how I can contribute more effectively and benefit from this platform as a participant.
This semester, I diligently participated in the task of editing Wikipedia, which has given me new perspectives on academic assignments. Firstly, compared to traditional classroom tasks, editing Wikipedia introduced me to a completely different learning method and experience.
In traditional assignments, we typically demonstrate our understanding and grasp of course content to our teachers. These assignments are often aimed at achieving specific grade standards and typically end upon completion. Editing Wikipedia, however, is entirely different. It requires our contributions to be public, accessible, and usable by people worldwide. This openness makes me feel that my efforts can have an impact on a broader community, rather than just aiming for a score.
Secondly, editing Wikipedia has taught me how to collaborate with others and to respect and adhere to the community's norms and guidelines. During the editing process, I'm not just completing a task but participating in a community-driven creation. I engage in discussions, exchanges with like-minded editors, and accept suggestions and feedback from them. This collaborative process has allowed me to experience the power of collective wisdom and teamwork.
Most importantly, editing Wikipedia has been enjoyable. Compared to traditional assignments, I find editing on Wikipedia more engaging and fulfilling. Seeing my contributions published in real-time and potentially helpful to readers worldwide gives me a sense of accomplishment that traditional assignments cannot match. Editing Wikipedia is not just an academic task; it's a way to facilitate knowledge sharing and global connectivity.
Additionally, editing Wikipedia has taught me to conduct research and citations more rigorously and meticulously. Every edit and addition requires reliance on reliable sources and facts, which has not only enhanced my academic writing skills but also fostered a deeper appreciation for the authenticity of information.
In conclusion, editing Wikipedia has not only provided me with a new learning experience but also challenged my traditional views on academic tasks. It emphasizes openness, collaboration, and real-time engagement, deepening my understanding of the significance of academic work. As I continue my academic journey, I will cherish my experience of editing Wikipedia and strive to make further progress and contributions on the path of global knowledge sharing.
2.Interesting Point
One of the most intriguing aspects of editing Wikipedia is the real-time impact it can have on global knowledge. Unlike traditional assignments that are often confined to a classroom or academic setting, editing Wikipedia allows for immediate publication of contributions that are accessible to anyone with an internet connection. This means that within moments of making an edit, I could potentially be influencing readers from diverse backgrounds and locations around the world. This dynamic and interactive nature of Wikipedia editing adds a layer of excitement and relevance to the academic process that is hard to replicate in more traditional assignments.
3.Discussion
During my experience editing Wikipedia, I encountered some areas that prompted me to ponder. Particularly in maintaining accuracy, neutrality, and verifiability, I found these challenges to be quite nuanced. For instance, how does one balance differing perspectives on the same topic among editors? When faced with insufficient sources or disputes, how does one make informed decisions? These questions not only involve academic research skills but also encompass the complexities of effectively disseminating and managing knowledge on a global platform.
Moreover, I questioned whether editing Wikipedia influences public perceptions of specific topics, and how this influence evolves and spreads globally. These are pertinent issues worthy of deeper exploration.
These reflections underscore that participating in Wikipedia editing goes beyond mere content submission; it requires ongoing learning and reflection to navigate an increasingly complex and dynamic information landscape. By discussing these issues, I aim to gain a deeper understanding of the significance of Wikipedia as an open and community-driven knowledge platform, and how I can contribute more effectively and benefit from this platform as a participant.
I think this course is the most worthwhile one to apply for. It not only teaches us many practical operations, but also allows us to edit the items we like.
ReplyDelete