w15.2 TIANXIAOYU

From my review of the Wikipedia Manual of Style (MoS), I've learned several key principles that are essential for maintaining the quality and consistency of articles:


1. Consistency：It is crucial to keep the style and formatting uniform within a single article and as consistent as possible across different articles. This helps create a seamless reading experience for users.

   

2. Stability：We should avoid making changes to an article’s style just for the sake of change. Any modifications from one guideline-defined style to another should have a compelling reason, ensuring that articles remain stable over time.

   

3. Clarity：The primary goal is to enhance the readability of the encyclopedia. This involves careful attention to wording, layout, formatting, and the inclusion of clear diagrams, making it easier for readers to understand the content.

   

4. Referencing：It’s important to provide reliable sources for the information presented. This allows readers to verify the content and trace it back to credible references, enhancing the encyclopedia's trustworthiness.


The MoS also includes detailed advice on various topics, such as punctuation, units of measurement, and handling trivia. When facing specific issues, users can utilize the MoS search box for guidance. In situations of uncertainty, replicating the formatting of a well-structured existing article, particularly a featured one, can be very helpful. While adherence to the MoS is significant, the verifiability of the content should always take precedence over perfect formatting.


Question:

Given the emphasis on consistency and stability, how should editors handle situations where there is a conflict between the MoS guidelines and the existing style of a widely referenced article? Should the article be updated to conform to the MoS, or should the existing style be maintained to preserve stability?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W10.2 May 10 (Fri)—CHENG SHIYI

1.Summary   Remix culture is a culture that allows and encourages the creation of derivative works through the editing of existing material, challenges exclusive copyright restrictions, promotes the idea of remixing, and facilitates the free flow of creativity. In Remix, Lessig describes the shift from a read-only culture to a read/write culture, where the advent of digital technology has redefined the way culture is created and distributed in ways that facilitate the interactive relationship between producers and consumers and democratize the production of ideas and the distribution of content. The history of remix culture dates back to the 19th century, e.g.: according to American media scholar Henry Jenkins, but the balance between creation and consumption shifted with the advancement of analog recording and reproduction technologies.The analog era of the early 20th century, with its specialized creative equipment and cheap consumer devices, led to the strengthening of proprieta...
Read more

How to make sure content you add to Wikipedia is not a copyright violation?—— LI MENGRU

1.Summary Firstly, we can use as much content as possible that is clearly released under free copyright licenses or is in the public domain. This content is typically available on dedicated free material websites, such as Wikimedia Commons, Pixabay, Unsplash, and others. Doing so can help avoid copyright disputes and ensure that the content we add is lawful. Secondly, if we wish to use others' work on Wikipedia, we must reach out to the copyright holders and request permission. This may require communication with the authors or copyright owners and obtaining written permission or usage agreements. Only after obtaining authorization can we use these works on Wikipedia. Additionally, we can choose to create our own original content and add it to Wikipedia. This not only helps avoid copyright issues but also contributes new and valuable content to Wikipedia. We can generate original content through independent research, interviews, or creation to enrich Wikipedia's information res...
Read more

W1.1 Intro class: intro to class, blog, wiki and other assignments——CHENG SHIYI

1. Summary  I have taken classes from you, the professor, before and have always been interested in Wikipedia, so I chose to take your class this semester regardless. I understand from your introduction to all the courses in the lecture that this semester's Collective Intelligence in Practice course is centered around Wikipedia, which I understand is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and that Wikipedia brings together knowledge from around the world. One of the quotes in your course syllabus is that Technocrati's chief technologist says that soon "Wiki-knowledge will be a required job skill." Wikipedia, a non-profit encyclopedic website, is ranked among the top 5 most popular websites in the world, all thanks to a little bit of contribution from volunteers in the world. I see from this that the Collective Intelligence in Practice program understands Collective Intelligence on the Internet through Wikipedia from a sociological perspective. There are many ways to s...
Read more