week11.2LINZIYU

 summary：

Symbolic interaction theory, also known as symbolic interactionism, is a sociological and social psychological theory that advocates studying the life of human groups from the daily natural environment of individuals in which people interact. This theory was founded by American sociologist G. H. Mead and formally proposed by his student Blumer in 1937. Symbolic interactionism emphasizes the ability of humans to create and use symbols, and believes that symbols (such as language, text, actions, etc.) play a key role in people's interactions.


The interesting point of symbolic interactionism

is that it reveals the complexity and subtlety of human communication. First, it emphasizes the central position of symbols in interpersonal communication. Symbols are not only carriers of information, but also the key for people to share and understand each other's intentions, emotions and identities. For example, a simple smile or gesture may convey completely different meanings in different cultures and situations. Secondly, symbolic interactionism reveals how people adjust their behavior according to each other's reactions in interaction. This dynamic and mutually influential communication process makes interpersonal communication rich and interesting.


Symbolic interactionism has triggered our in-depth thinking about human communication and cognition. First, it reminds us to realize that our behavior is largely influenced by our interpretation and expectations of the behavior of others. This interpretation and expectation is often carried out through symbols, so we need to pay more attention to the role of symbols in communication to avoid misunderstandings and conflicts. Secondly, symbolic interactionism emphasizes the subjectivity and initiative of people. In interaction, we not only passively accept information, but also actively interpret, create and use symbols to influence the behavior and cognition of others. The exercise of this subjectivity and initiative makes interpersonal communication more interesting and creative.


In addition, symbolic interactionism also reminds us to pay attention to the influence of social culture and historical background on the meaning of symbols. In different societies and cultures, symbols may have different meanings and values. Therefore, we need to understand and use symbols more carefully to avoid cultural conflicts and misunderstandings.


In general, symbolic interactionism provides us with a new perspective to understand human communication and cognition. It reveals the core position of symbols in interpersonal communication and how people interact and influence each other's behavior and cognition through symbols. At the same time, it also triggers our in-depth thinking about the complexity and subtlety of human communication, making us pay more attention to the role of symbols in communication and how to better use symbols to promote effective communication and understanding.

Discussion: How does symbolic interactionism emphasize the centrality of symbols in interpersonal communication?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2024) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incorpora
Read more

W1.1 Intro class: intro to class, blog, wiki and other assignments——CHENG SHIYI

1. Summary  I have taken classes from you, the professor, before and have always been interested in Wikipedia, so I chose to take your class this semester regardless. I understand from your introduction to all the courses in the lecture that this semester's Collective Intelligence in Practice course is centered around Wikipedia, which I understand is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and that Wikipedia brings together knowledge from around the world. One of the quotes in your course syllabus is that Technocrati's chief technologist says that soon "Wiki-knowledge will be a required job skill." Wikipedia, a non-profit encyclopedic website, is ranked among the top 5 most popular websites in the world, all thanks to a little bit of contribution from volunteers in the world. I see from this that the Collective Intelligence in Practice program understands Collective Intelligence on the Internet through Wikipedia from a sociological perspective. There are many ways to st
Read more

W10.2 May 10 (Fri)—CHENG SHIYI

1.Summary   Remix culture is a culture that allows and encourages the creation of derivative works through the editing of existing material, challenges exclusive copyright restrictions, promotes the idea of remixing, and facilitates the free flow of creativity. In Remix, Lessig describes the shift from a read-only culture to a read/write culture, where the advent of digital technology has redefined the way culture is created and distributed in ways that facilitate the interactive relationship between producers and consumers and democratize the production of ideas and the distribution of content. The history of remix culture dates back to the 19th century, e.g.: according to American media scholar Henry Jenkins, but the balance between creation and consumption shifted with the advancement of analog recording and reproduction technologies.The analog era of the early 20th century, with its specialized creative equipment and cheap consumer devices, led to the strengthening of proprietary c
Read more