WEEK9.1LINZIYU

 summary：

Here are some suggestions on how to deal with false information in Wikipedia and how to deal with it:


1. Dealing with false information in Wikipedia


Reporting and verification: Once false information is found in Wikipedia, users should immediately report it to the relevant management team or editor. The management team will verify it and decide whether to delete or modify the relevant content based on the facts.

Editing and correction: Users can also participate in the editing and correction process by providing accurate and reliable materials to replace or supplement false information. However, it should be noted that all edits need to be supported by corresponding evidence and follow Wikipedia's editing rules and guidelines.

Establish a feedback mechanism: Wikipedia can establish an effective feedback mechanism to encourage users to actively feedback false information, while promptly handling user feedback to ensure the accuracy of the information.

2. Coping strategies


Improve media literacy: Users should improve their media literacy and learn to judge the authenticity of information. When browsing Wikipedia or other online platforms, be cautious and critical, and do not easily believe unverified information.

Seek multi-channel verification: For important or information involving major interests, users should verify it through multiple channels, including consulting authoritative media, official documents, or expert opinions in related fields.

Participate in community building: Users can actively participate in community building on platforms such as Wikipedia, and improve the information quality of the platform by contributing their knowledge and experience. At the same time, they can also supervise the editing behavior of other users and jointly maintain the accuracy of the information on the platform.

In addition, to prevent the recurrence of historical fraud incidents such as the "Kashen Silver Mine", Wikipedia can strengthen the review of the editorial team and establish stricter editing guidelines and review mechanisms. At the same time, technical means such as artificial intelligence and machine learning can also be used to automatically detect and screen the content of entries, and timely discover and deal with false information.


In general, dealing with false information in Wikipedia requires the joint efforts of users, management teams, and technical means. Through strategies such as improving media literacy, seeking multi-channel verification, participating in community building, and strengthening review efforts and technical applications, the challenges brought by false information can be effectively addressed.


Discussion: How to increase Wikipedia user engagement


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introduction to the blog

 This blog is a digital forum where students from Collective Intelligence in Practice: Understanding Wikipedia at the Hanyang University in Korea (2024) will discuss their weekly readings and activities. Each week you are expected to post a blog post on our blog and make a comment on another student's post. You can do so on one of the following three topics: a) You can blog about the readings for the next week. As you are expected to do the assigned readings FOR the lectures they are assigned to, you are expected to post your blog and comments BEFORE that lecture. An ideal commentary should be about half a page in length (~200 words), divided into three clearly labeled sections in which you: 1) summarize in your own words of materials you read; 2) mention any new, interesting, or unusual items learned; 3) identify at least one question, concern, or discussion angle that is either problematic in some respect or could have been elaborated more. This question is likely to be incorpora
Read more

W1.1 Intro class: intro to class, blog, wiki and other assignments——CHENG SHIYI

1. Summary  I have taken classes from you, the professor, before and have always been interested in Wikipedia, so I chose to take your class this semester regardless. I understand from your introduction to all the courses in the lecture that this semester's Collective Intelligence in Practice course is centered around Wikipedia, which I understand is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and that Wikipedia brings together knowledge from around the world. One of the quotes in your course syllabus is that Technocrati's chief technologist says that soon "Wiki-knowledge will be a required job skill." Wikipedia, a non-profit encyclopedic website, is ranked among the top 5 most popular websites in the world, all thanks to a little bit of contribution from volunteers in the world. I see from this that the Collective Intelligence in Practice program understands Collective Intelligence on the Internet through Wikipedia from a sociological perspective. There are many ways to st
Read more

W10.2 May 10 (Fri)—CHENG SHIYI

1.Summary   Remix culture is a culture that allows and encourages the creation of derivative works through the editing of existing material, challenges exclusive copyright restrictions, promotes the idea of remixing, and facilitates the free flow of creativity. In Remix, Lessig describes the shift from a read-only culture to a read/write culture, where the advent of digital technology has redefined the way culture is created and distributed in ways that facilitate the interactive relationship between producers and consumers and democratize the production of ideas and the distribution of content. The history of remix culture dates back to the 19th century, e.g.: according to American media scholar Henry Jenkins, but the balance between creation and consumption shifted with the advancement of analog recording and reproduction technologies.The analog era of the early 20th century, with its specialized creative equipment and cheap consumer devices, led to the strengthening of proprietary c
Read more